Re: [EXTERNAL] Cancel Jan 11th, 2022 meeting?

I believe I just got another email (replied to only me, not reply-all'd)
saying someone else had a conflict.
That means two people would be out and no one has mentioned any important
topics.

Let's go ahead and cancel tomorrow's meeting.

We'll resume our next planned meeting, on the 24th.

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 2:49 PM Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal) <
Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com> wrote:

> I’ve actually got a meeting conflict at that time so I’m OK with
> re-scheduling if there is something to discuss.
>
>
>
> If not, then I’m fine with canceling.  If there are any refinements
> required, I’m happy to discuss.
>
>
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Saturday, January 8, 2022 at 2:10 PM
> *To: *public-png@w3.org <public-png@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Cancel Jan 11th, 2022 meeting?
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have not found any meeting topics important enough for us to justify
> allocating your time for the Jan 11th, 2022 meeting.
>
>
>
> Should we cancel the meeting? Are there topics anyone wants to discuss?
>
>
>
>
> As a reminder, there is progress being made and discussions can happen on
> GitHub. For example:
>
>    - Chris Lilley has updated a lot of bit rot from the 2nd Edition.
>    - Chris Seeger has added wording for the cICP chunk.
>    - I just sent a pull request that begins the adoption of ReSpec.
>
>
>
> Here is the near-term work I still have scheduled:
>
>    -
>    - Chris Blume
>
>
>    - Finish ReSpec transition
>
>
>    -
>    - Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
>
>
>    - Update the definition of the public / private attribute, encouraging
>       people to register their private chunks
>
>
>    - Chris Lilley
>
>
>    - Clarify the public / private bit
>       - 2nd Edition errata spec wording & Web Platform Test updates
>       - APNG spec wording
>
>
>    - Leonard Rosenthol
>
>
>    - Exif spec wording
>       - XMP spec wording
>
>
>    - Chris Seeger
>
>
>    - iCCN spec wording
>
>