- From: <bonatti@na.infn.it>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:36:17 +0200 (CEST)
- To: "Casassa Mont, Marco" <marco_casassa-mont@hp.com>
- Cc: "public-pling@w3.org" <public-pling@w3.org>
> Piero and All - could this lack of progress (specifically in terms of the > two highlighted points) be due to the fact that RIF is a reasonably recent > specification or are there any intrinsic adoption problem (e.g. > complexity, lack of requirements/needs, no support from vendors, etc.)? > Any clue? well, as far as I can observe the main reason might actually be that RIF is young. moreover, the usual issues affected the standardization progress: - wheel rediscovery and complication of simple things due to different background, company interests etc. - eventually lots of effort to publish a document on the core of the standard in reasonable time (I believe the first recommendation has been released very recently) - all advanced/specific topics postponed moreover, I believe that REWERSE was the only partner with specific expertise on security/privacy applications best, piero
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2008 19:40:34 UTC