- From: <bonatti@na.infn.it>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
- To: "Casassa Mont, Marco" <marco_casassa-mont@hp.com>
- Cc: "public-pling@w3.org" <public-pling@w3.org>
ciao Marco, one of the initial use cases of RIF has been provided by REWERSE, WG I2. it concerns policy exchange as in Protune's trust negotiations. I don't think there has been much specific further progress along the practical questions you posed cheers piero > Hi. > > I recently came across the "W3C Rule Interchange Format" initiative > (http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/charter): I think it could be of some > relevance to this PLING IG and related discussions (in particular about > the portability and transaltion of rules/policies across heterogeneous > policy management systems). > > However, I have a few practical questions: > > 1) What is the current applicability of this standard in the policy > domain? Any example, real-world case-study, etc.? > > 2) Has this standard already been taken onboard by any vendor/solution? > > Your input/view would really be appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Marco > > > > ________________________________ > > > [http://www.hp.ca/corporate/signature/hp_logo.gif]<http://www.hp.ca/> > Marco Casassa Mont > Senior Researcher > Hewlett-Packard Laboratories > > Phone: +44 117 3128794 FAX: +44 1173129250 > Email: marco.casassa-mont@hp.com<mailto:marco.casassa-mont@hp.com> > > External Web Page: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/mcm/ > Blog: > http://www.communities.hp.com/online/blogs/mcm/<http://h20325.www2.hp.com/blogs/mcm> > > 'All points of view are my own and not necessarily HP's as well' > > Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, > Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England > > The contents of this message and any attachments to it are > confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this > message in error, you should delete it from your system immediately > and advise the sender. > > To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated > you should consider this message and attachments as "HP > CONFIDENTIAL". > > > ________________________________ > > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 14:18:27 UTC