- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:05:35 -0800
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13986 Astounding. Thanks for that pointer, hadn't seen that history. Still, communication of a package is different than communication of individual components, because there's an explicit processing step which is "create the package". Even if there might be some reasons why Apache hasn't fixed their configuration files, is there any reason to believe that "create a package" software couldn't be configured to always use well-known file extensions or (if allowed) well-known content-types? I'll still claim that the closer you are to the origin of the data, the more likely you are going to be able to guess the context of the data. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 05:06:15 UTC