- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:23:07 -0500
- To: "Chaals McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF98D69789.167EB7A2-ON86257EDD.007AD8DF-86257EDD.007AF78C@us.ibm.com>
@rel is not in SVG. rel="start" is innocuous Who came up with this meta data in rel. A lot of it is dreadful. Rich Schwerdtfeger From: "Chaals McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru> To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Date: 10/13/2015 06:15 AM Subject: Re: Issue-742: Proposal aria-destination On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:39:34 +0200, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > This is not a formal proposal but one that would seed a formal proposal > if the group agrees. I would need to coordinate with coga and the > aria-dpub folks. Normally I would push this to ARIA 2.0 but because we > have two efforts wanting essentially the same thing and I don't want to > have multiple roles for a link I believe this is a better approach. > > aria-destination - Provides the context of a link. > > This attribute provides contextual semantics for the destination of a > link so that authors may use this information to drive a consistent user > interface. Some assistive technologies may this information important to > provide to assistive technologies. > > The following is a list of possible values that the destination could > take on from the coga task force and I suggest we consider a subset of > these: > * home Does this mean a home page? If so, it is covered by the existing rel="start" which is already in HTML 4 [1] and in HTML5 through being listed in the microformats wiki [2]. The proposed rel="home" [3] seems to be a synonym. > * sign in > * sign up These values should be proposed for rel. The HTML specifications have traditionally suggested the address element for these, but it is insufficiently clear what the content means. > * site map This is covered by the proposal for rel="sitemap" [4] to be included in HTML5. > * help This is already part of HTML5 [5] as rel="help" > * terms Does this mean license, which is already in HTML5 [6], or something else? > * comment > * language (English) > * post > * social (provide label - such as facebook twitter) > * tools Can you explain what these are meant to do, or provide a pointer to where they are described or discussed in more detail? It is pretty hard from the standalone page linked to understand > * about us > * contact us > * our email > * our phone > * product > * services These things are already covered by the widely used schema.org, *currently* used on millions of domains. It makes more sense to read that existing markup than to try and build a parallel version > This is based on this wiki: > https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html > > I introduce this now as the dpub aria task force roles for different > types of links which reflect the destination of the link provided. Since > both task forces need a feature like this we should place an anchor > inside ARIA 1.1 so that they mau build off it. Instead of doing that, I suggest putting this in HTML itself, except for the cases where schema.org seems to have a significant mind-share and deployment already. > The current Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA module > (http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/dpub.html) has these roles: > > > doc-biblioref: A reference to a bibliography entry. > doc-glossref: A reference to a glossary definition Both of these are readily covered - glossary by the existing rel value, biblioref by retrieving the proposal that wasn't accepted for HTML 4. > doc-location: A link that allows the user to jump to a related location > in the content (e.g., from a footnote to its reference, from an index > entry to where the topic is discussed, or from a glossary definition to > where the term is used). The footnote use case can easily be covered with the existing rel="prev" / rel="previous". For an index entry this makes less sense, as it is very common that there will be multiple places a term appears. An alternative approach would be to use the rev attribute for this case, as this seems to be a pretty sound use case. > doc-noteref: A reference to a footnote, typically appearing as a > superscripted number or symbol in the main body of text. This can readily be covered by retrieving the proposed rel="footnote". > I recommend these be additional tokenized values, without the doc-, for > aria-destination and a subset of what coga would like for ARIA 1.1. The > Coga task force can then expand on the values. > > > example: > > style { > > a[a[aria-destination="glossref"] { *[rel=glossary] { Also covers the case where you have role="link" instead of a real link, and the now mostly legacy case of image maps, instead of using multiple CSS declarations > background-color: yellow; > > border: 2px blue; > > } > div[role="link"][aria-destination="glossref"] { > > background-color: yellow; > > border: 2px blue; > } > > > > <a aria-destination="glossref" href="..." >discombobulated</a> <a rel="glossary" href="…" already exists in the wild, but I am not sure how common it is. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#h-6.12 [2] http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#HTML5_link_type_extensions [3] http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-home [4] http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-sitemap [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-help [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-license cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 22:23:45 UTC