- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:05:13 -0500
- To: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Minutes from the 19 November ARIA teleconference are provided below as text, and are available as hypertext at: http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html W3C - DRAFT - Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 19 Nov 2015 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present Bryan, JamesN, Joanmarie_Diggs, Joseph_Scheuhammer, MichaelC, fesch, janina, matt_king Regrets Rich, Michiel Chair MichaelC Scribe , Janina Contents * Topics 1. Next weekŽs meeting 2. Issues & Actions * Summary of Action Items * Summary of Resolutions _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ <janina> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/f18bba4c6c569e507d6c62096d3b41263e67887c/html-aam/html-aam.html <janina> scribe: <fesch> scribe: Janina Next weekŽs meeting <scribe> scribe: janina mc: No meeting this coming Thursday, 26 November, because of U.S. Turkey Day! Issues & Actions issue-504? <trackbot> issue-504 -- radio shouldn't have aria-selected -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/504 mc: believe it's done clown: core-aam? jd: I checked RESOLUTION: Close Issue-504 <MichaelC> close issue-504 <trackbot> Closed issue-504. action-1736? <trackbot> action-1736 -- James Nurthen to Create an attribute to indicate a button is the primary button -- due 2015-10-19 -- OPEN <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1736 jn: discussed at tpac <clown> issue-624? <trackbot> issue-624 -- Primary Action Concept -- raised <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/624 jn: I'm to finish a proposal ... Yet to do that, though mc: so, still pending <MichaelC> trackbot, associate issue-624 with action-1736 <trackbot> action-1736 (Create an attribute to indicate a button is the primary button) associated with issue-624. [general concern that Leonie had concerns about this] <jamesn> it is in here http://www.w3.org/2015/10/26-aria-minutes.html <clown> specifically: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/26-aria-minutes.html#item03 mc: Weneed to know whether Leonie's concern was on behalf of Web Platforms WG jn: She wasn't in the room when we discussed at TPAC action-1688? <trackbot> action-1688 -- James Nurthen to Draft proposal for aria-interactive -- due 2015-09-23 -- OPEN <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1688 mc: Rich is asking whether we can close this? jn: Think it's too late to do anything meaningful with this right now ... Unless we allow ARIA-Activedescendent on on role of application clown: so application has children jn: could be, no? ... a chart, with focusable elements in SVG clown: OK jd: Also fits with Matt's recent additions jn: currently works, but is a conformance error <clown> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-activedescendant mc: suggest closing, and raise new action to raise the proposed resolution jd: on me, please <MichaelC> action-1688: seems there isnŽt support for this approach; instead, adding aria-activedescendant to application seems acceptable <trackbot> Notes added to action-1688 Draft proposal for aria-interactive. <MichaelC> close action-1688 <trackbot> Closed action-1688. <MichaelC> ACTION: joanie to put aria-activedescendant on application and request WG review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-1743 - Put aria-activedescendant on application and request wg review [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2015-11-26]. RESOLUTION: put Activedescendent on role application -- needs confirmation [matt has joined the call, so we're rehashing the above] <MichaelC> trackbot, associate action-1743 with product-17 <trackbot> action-1743 (Put aria-activedescendant on application and request wg review) associated with product-17. <clown> <application><group aria-activedescendant="foo"> ⊠</group></application> (JamesN's current situation). mk: app has no subclasses ... ... see no downsides <clown> proposal: <application aria-activedescendant="foo"> ⊠</application> <MichaelC> action-1743: this is a spin-off from action-1688 whose approach we decided not to pursue <trackbot> Notes added to action-1743 Put aria-activedescendant on application and request wg review. [discussion on implication for aapis] <clown> http://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html#include_elements mk: hard for browser to conform to 5.2.1 in mapping jn: yes mk: concerned will have focus, but might not have role and label, so what then? ... without an implicit jn: should be an authoring error <clown> http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#aria-activedescendant (see 3rd paragraph) fe: in svg we have explicit requirements on what's put into the tree <MichaelC> issue-633? <trackbot> issue-633 -- listbox and tree may contain only static items; badly need interactive widgets that can contain interactive typed items -- closed <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/633 mk: would like to see language somewhere that makes it clear elements referred to by activedescendent, if not in a context with required or implicit semantics, that authors must provide role and label <MichaelC> action-1743: work with Matt to make it clear elements referred to by aria-activedescendant have a clear context <trackbot> Notes added to action-1743 Put aria-activedescendant on application and request wg review. mc: suggest we do issue triage ... issue-411? <trackbot> issue-411 -- Consider aria-description which would take a string like aria-label -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/411 mc: more than 4 years old, obe? mk: another feature takes care of this? ... allows a string attribute ... mc: not part of recent description discussions -- we're looking for a single solution that meets all use cases ... suggest we don't meet this in 1.1. Could move to 2.0 mk: suggest 2.0 ... thinking of specific kinds of help, e.g. for keyboard mc: we have keyboard-shortcuts help ... notes we intend next published draft will be CR and soon ... suggest best with this at this time is 2.0 <joanie> +1 to keeping it open, but for 2.0 so as not to make things messy mk: OK <MichaelC> trackbot, associate issue-411 with product-2 <trackbot> issue-411 (Consider aria-description which would take a string like aria-label) associated with product-2. issue-427? <trackbot> issue-427 -- Need a way for application to find out what role has been applied to or computed for an element -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/427 mc: also a 4-year old issue clown: alex's new api fe: also wapa mc: close? Saying wapa? [agreement] <MichaelC> issue-427: WAPA proposal would meet this requirement <trackbot> Notes added to issue-427 Need a way for application to find out what role has been applied to or computed for an element. <MichaelC> close issue-427 <trackbot> Closed issue-427. RESOLUTION: Close issue-427 as overcome by WAPA issue-497? <trackbot> issue-497 -- When features require an element with a particular role be present (e.g., grid requires that gridcell be owned by row), implicit native semantics, if defined, count (e.g., tr without a role attribute counts as an element with role row) -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/497 jn: think this is now covered mk: was an exception ... but not verified <joanie> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Nov/0141.html mc: Possible we need a newer, more explicit issue, but think this issue should close RESOLUTION: Close Issue-497 and see how things go <MichaelC> close issue-497 <trackbot> Closed issue-497. issue-504? <trackbot> issue-504 -- radio shouldn't have aria-selected -- closed <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/504 jd: Already closed this mc: oops issue-526? <trackbot> issue-526 -- Allow non-global states and properties to be used without an explicit ARIA role, when the element has an implict ARIA semantic corresponding to an appropriate role - ARIA 1.1 -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/526 mc: Hmm, this is "see how it goes" ... jn: Isn't this now allowed? mk: don't think so <clown> action-1405? <trackbot> action-1405 -- Joanmarie Diggs to For issue-526 modify spec. to allow non-global attrs to apply to host language elements having the correct aria semantics -- due 2015-06-25 -- CLOSED <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1405 <jamesn> I want to make sure i don't have to write <button role="button" aria-pressed="true"> <joanie> From my statement in the ACTION: "However, authors must only use non-global states and properties on elements with a role supporting the state or property; either defined as an explicit WAI-ARIA role, **or as defined by the host language semantic matching an appropriate WAI-ARIA role**."(emphasis added) mc: Perhaps we keep open and action someone for a proposal [group noting JD's quote from the spec above] mc: Looking at today's pub ... ... Still in the text ... ... so we can close? RESOLUTION: Close issue-526 as completed <clown> +1 <MichaelC> close issue-526 <trackbot> Closed issue-526. <jamesn> +1 <MichaelC> issue-526: met by text is spec "However, authors must only use non-global states and properties on elements with a role supporting the state or property; either defined as an explicit WAI-ARIA role, **or as defined by the host language semantic matching an appropriate WAI-ARIA role**."(emphasis added) <trackbot> Notes added to issue-526 Allow non-global states and properties to be used without an explicit ARIA role, when the element has an implict ARIA semantic corresponding to an appropriate role - ARIA 1.1. mk: asking whewhy more grid changes weren't forthcoming ... jd: see above uri ... looking .... <joanie> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Nov/0141.html mc: so awaiting further discussion <joanie> action-1725 <trackbot> action-1725 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Create a proposal for an article feed -- due 2015-09-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1725 action-1725? <trackbot> action-1725 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Create a proposal for an article feed -- due 2015-09-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1725 <MichaelC> Rich: Need further discussion on action 1725 related to list post https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Nov/0141.html issue-561? <trackbot> issue-561 -- We need @aria-placeholder as backup for @placeholder in custom fields. -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/561 jd: done <MichaelC> close issue-561 <trackbot> Closed issue-561. RESOLUTION: Close issue-561 as done clown: already has mappings!! issue-610? <trackbot> issue-610 -- Comboboxes should allow complex children elements -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/610 mk: on my list, want to do this for 1.1, and could be a simple change ... mc: Action on James, reassign? mk: I'm hot for this one! issue-619? <trackbot> issue-619 -- ARIA 1.1 should disallow host languages from declaring @aria-label from being declared in direct semantic conflict with a host language attribute. -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/619 mc: Huh? ... OK, have action and I'll get to it issue-639? <trackbot> issue-639 -- Making key events work automatically on focusable elements matching certain roles (e.g. button, link, checkbox), that have click event handlers -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/639 mc: Is this an ARIA issue? clown: If role=button browser auto makes space work???? jd: seems hard to implement in a performant fashion ... Chaas interested in this RESOLUTION: Move to 2.0 so we can discuss again, but may not really be an ARIA issue issue-641? <trackbot> issue-641 -- Abstract role section allows nameFrom content, and some subclassed roles under section do not allow nameFrom:contents (even definition, img, and math, which seems like they should) -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/641 mk: we were concerned whether inheritance issues ... mc: suggest an action to implement simply ... may not even need confirmation ... JD can raise issues if needed? jn: worth 1.1 time? mc: it is cleanups <MichaelC> ACTION: joanie to implement edits proposed in issue-641, raise to group if any subsantive changes come out [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-1744 - Implement edits proposed in issue-641, raise to group if any subsantive changes come out [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2015-11-26]. <MichaelC> trackbot, associate action-1744 with issue-641 <trackbot> action-1744 (Implement edits proposed in issue-641, raise to group if any subsantive changes come out) associated with issue-641. RESOLUTION: See action-1744 issue-648? <trackbot> issue-648 -- Role computation with native host language semantics -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/648 jd: looks like a dup mc: yes ... suggest we wait for rich [agreement] issue-680? <trackbot> issue-680 -- Create a new glossary definition called "Value of a Control". That has the following proposed definition. -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/680 clown: did, diss'd <MichaelC> issue-680: glossary definition was created, implemented, not liked, removed, so closing <trackbot> Notes added to issue-680 Create a new glossary definition called "Value of a Control". That has the following proposed definition.. RESOLUTION: Close issue-680 is done, and dumped <MichaelC> close issue-680 <trackbot> Closed issue-680. issue-682? <trackbot> issue-682 -- Clarify what happens to required owned childrens' roles when native host language parent is overridden with a WAI-ARIA role. -- open <trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/682 clown: believe this has been dealt with mk: when is this an issue? jd: believe belongs in mapping spec ... agree with issue mc? so implementation guide for 1.1? <MichaelC> ACTION: clown to make a proposal to address issue-682 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html#action03] <trackbot> Created ACTION-1745 - Make a proposal to address issue-682 [on Joseph Scheuhammer - due 2015-11-26]. <MichaelC> trackbot, associate action-1745 with issue-682 <trackbot> action-1745 (Make a proposal to address issue-682) associated with issue-682. RESOLUTION Move issue-682 to product 1.1 implementation guide; create action for clown to address mc: we're at the hour, and we've handled about half of the open issues! Excellent Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: clown to make a proposal to address issue-682 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: joanie to implement edits proposed in issue-641, raise to group if any subsantive changes come out [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: joanie to put aria-activedescendant on application and request WG review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-aria-minutes.html#action01] Summary of Resolutions 1. Close Issue-504 2. put Activedescendent on role application -- needs confirmation 3. Close issue-427 as overcome by WAPA 4. Close Issue-497 and see how things go 5. Close issue-526 as completed 6. Close issue-561 as done 7. Move to 2.0 so we can discuss again, but may not really be an ARIA issue 8. See action-1744 9. Close issue-680 is done, and dumped [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Scribes: , Janina Present: Bryan JamesN Joanmarie_Diggs Joseph_Scheuhammer MichaelC fesch janina matt_king Regrets: Rich Michiel Found Date: 19 Nov 2015 People with action items: clown joanie -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:05:40 UTC