- From: Matthew King <mattking@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:41:17 -0700
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <201506121642.t5CGgJ9A015114@d01av01.pok.ibm.com>
The 2nd person "you" should be removed from: "When specifying a key on the keyboard that changes when you hold down a modifier key other than an alphabetic key, you must specify the unmodified key name." Matt King IBM Senior Technical Staff Member I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398 mattking@us.ibm.com From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Date: 06/12/2015 08:43 AM Subject: aria-kbdshortcuts property for review - ACTION-1642 I have posted a branch with Rich's proposal for the aria-kbdshortcuts property: https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/Keyboard_Shortcuts/aria/aria.html#aria-kbdshortcuts A couple notes: I made "must" to be RFC2199 MUST. Because of this, the DOM Level 3 KeyboardEvent key Values spec needed to be a normative reference. We've avoided having too many normative dependencies, and while it's ok for now, ARIA 1.1 wouldn't be able to advance to Recommendation until that spec does. That may be appropriate, but I wanted to point it out. After putting the property on the four roles listed in Rich's proposal, I note that it inherited into one role not listed in the proposal: switch. That's probably fine but wanted to make sure it was clear where it's inheriting into. Michael
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 16:42:50 UTC