- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:22:19 -0500
- To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Janina and I walked through the ARIA spec to find instances of requirements on mainstream user agent UI. We did some rewording of aria-describedat to get at what we understand to be the intention without imposing such requirements. We found only one other instance, in aria-invalid, that we clarified by add "or assistive technologies" to the statement. There was a grammatical and a citation fix we noted the way. A diff showing these proposed edits is available: https://github.com/w3c/aria/commit/8bce342b50301a7fb575492477bd9f0e832c4c63 These edits are in a branch for proposal, not part of the spec yet. If these edits work, we can merge the branch, or make further changes first. For now, we just wanted show how things would look after this pass. We can also say that we did not find other instances of user agent UI requirements so we think the spec pretty clean. We look carefully at whether the word "provide" or "expose" was the right one in each circumstance and felt the spec was on track for this. Michael
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 15:22:19 UTC