RE: article navigation

I agree we should change this.

From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 9:39 AM
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>; public-aria@w3.org; PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: article navigation


On 3 December 2015 at 17:30, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
Yes, and as we have told them it is a very bad design to use articles as landmarks as there can be many of them.

related gripe, currently article maps to document role in some APIs [1], but it is often simply not a document

http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/#role-map-article

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 00:01:45 UTC