Re: Question regarding role=directory, the usage and purpose is unclear

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Shane,
>
> On 2015-04-17 10:22 AM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>> FWIW^2 ReSpec does this because I assumed a role of directory was
>> appropriate there.  Not because anyone told me that was the correct role to
>> use.  If it is wrong. someone should let me know!
>>
>
> It's correct.  A "directory" role is applicable to a static table of
> contents made with a nested lists of links, acccording to the spec [1].
>
> Since it's something ReSpec does, does that mean it applies to *all* W3C
> specs, notes, etc. that are built with ReSpec?
>
>
Yes.  ReSpec does this in ALL specs.

-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.