- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:56:05 +0100
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>, Birkir Gunnarsson <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnWJGhdjUU0C9RXrQiwbArAtvq5t+PG0mVZj_tkGbe7Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, So what are next steps to get spec warning added? Just wasted time getting outdated spec links updated in an article [1]. [1] https://github.com/operasoftware/devopera/pull/266 -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 26 March 2015 at 18:28, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > How about an: > > ls -lrt > > of the files behind the "latest" pointers that reference themselves > instead of some other doc? > > Shane McCarron writes: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > > > > OK, this is beginning to converge. > > > > > > 1) If the ‘latest version’ link is other than the current document, > > > display the floater, inviting the reader to see the latest version? > > > — what if the latest version has significantly different maturity? > i.e. > > > you are looking at PR of 1.0, there is a PR of 2.0 but the latest is a > WD > > > of 2.1. Which does the user want? > > > > > > 2) If there isn’t a ‘latest version’ link, allow anyone to ask that > such > > > be added, in the case the automatic system missed it. E.g. add to > WCAG 1.0 > > > a latest version to 2.0? > > > > > > I realize #2 is manual, but what else do we have? > > > > > > > and 3) If a spec supersedes another and the shortname changed, redirect > the > > old shortname to the new shortname. Also a manual step that is part of > > pubs process I would guess. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:48 , Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Absolutely. Where we have abandoned short names, we should certainly > > > > turn those into redirects. > > > > > > > > We're currently proposing this as the (soon to be FPWD of) HTML-AAM > > > > supercedes the older, now to be abandoned document and shortname: > > > > > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2015Mar/0065.html > > > > > > > > So, I suppose we should launch a crawler to help find these? That > seems > > > > eminently achievable. > > > > > > > > Janina > > > > > > > > Shane McCarron writes: > > > >> Okay - but in this case could we just redirect that short name to > 2.0? > > > I > > > >> mean, seriously. That's what we did with RDFa when the short name > > > >> changed. My understanding is that this is what is supposed to > happen > > > as a > > > >> matter of course when a short name changes. > > > >> > > > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/ > > > >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014/ > > > >> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/ > > > >> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-rdfa-core-20150317/ > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Steve Faulkner < > > > faulkner.steve@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 26 March 2015 at 04:00, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Can't it just say "This spec is obsolete. Click the 'latest > version' > > > >>>> link to see the latest version? This could be generically > applied to > > > every > > > >>>> old spec. Or at least almost every. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Unfortunately for some specs, WCAG 1.0 for example > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> There is no link to the latest version (i.e. wcag 2.0) > > > >>> > > > >>>> Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT > > > >>> > > > >>> unlike HTML 4.01 > > > >>> > > > >>> Latest version of HTML:http://www.w3.org/TR/html > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards > > > >>> > > > >>> SteveF > > > >>> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Shane McCarron > > > >> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > > > > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > > > > Email: janina@rednote.net > > > > > > > > Linux Foundation Fellow > > > > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > > > > > > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative > (WAI) > > > > Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > > > > Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > > > > > > David Singer > > > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Shane McCarron > > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > Email: janina@rednote.net > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > >
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 08:57:14 UTC