- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 15:35:47 -0400
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chaals from Yandex <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Mike Paciello <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
On 04/08/2015 11:57 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > As to process around publication it is my (perhaps naive) understanding that W3C staff serve the membership and as consensus is a pillar of the W3C process I would expect that subverting consensus is anathema to policy. Let me jump in the discussion here so the background is well understood. Some of the publications (basically everything except normal WD, LC, and non-substantive CR) are subject to the Director's approval: [[ /* must / obtain Director approval. ]] http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#transition-reqs The role of the Director, as "lead technical architect at W3C", is to assess "consensus <http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#def-Consensus> within W3C for architectural choices, publication of technical reports <http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Reports>, and new Activities <http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Activities>." http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Team It should be noted that, in practice, the Director does delegate his authority to approve transitions. For First Public Working Drafts, the Domain Leads are representing the Director. For CR, PR, REC, and PER, Ralph Swick and myself are representing the Director (modulo potential conflict of interest, ie I don't get to approve transitions coming from my own Domain). In addition, the W3C Process references the publication requirements at http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules It is the mission of the W3C Team to ensure that publication requirements are being followed, which have been mostly maintained by the W3C Communications Team over the years. So, Janina is correct to point out that, in order to change the W3C Process, you'd need to go and raise an issue with the W3C Advisory Board [1] if you do not believe that the Director must approve transitions. It is not however in the prerogative of a Working Group Chair or an entire Working Group to change that. You cannot change it for the PF Group without changing the rest of the Consortium either due to the nature of the W3C Process. Now, it may well be that you believe the W3C Team isn't efficient in terms of publishing and the Process is fine but ill-implemented by the W3C Team. Without more specific here, it'd be difficult for me to give more advise. We are in the process of changing our publications get done and I'd happy to get into more details in a separate thread as well. Philippe [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 19:36:02 UTC