- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:28:10 -0700
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
It's probably worth having PF or UAAG raise this as a potential accessibility issue. The CSS "user-zoom" property does not appear to be implemented yet and I do not see a bug for it on WebKit.org, but there are similar UI zoom control features implemented as meta viewport. Arguably a CSS variant is more accessible than viewport because a user can override it with a user style sheet, but the accessibility concern should be noted and accounted for in the CSS spec. > On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > > Hi, Cynthia, James, David: > > A quick question about a CSS spec long in draft status ... > > In our continuing W3C spec reviews, PF discussion raised the question about whether a particular CSS feature was being implementedin browsers. > > The draft specification is Device Adaptation: > http://www.w3.org/TR/css-device-adapt/ > > The feature we're curious about is called "fixed zoom." > > Our telecon discussion about this is minuted at: > http://www.w3.org/2014/08/20-pf-public-minutes.html#item09 > > Again, we're interested whether or not "fixed zoom" is actually being > implemented in shipping products. > > Any info you can provide would be very helpful. > > TIA > > Janina > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > Email: janina@rednote.net > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > -- Indifference towards people and the reality in which they live is actually the one and only cardinal sin in design. — Dieter Rams
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 19:28:43 UTC