- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:28:10 -0700
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
It's probably worth having PF or UAAG raise this as a potential accessibility issue. The CSS "user-zoom" property does not appear to be implemented yet and I do not see a bug for it on WebKit.org, but there are similar UI zoom control features implemented as meta viewport. Arguably a CSS variant is more accessible than viewport because a user can override it with a user style sheet, but the accessibility concern should be noted and accounted for in the CSS spec.
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
>
> Hi, Cynthia, James, David:
>
> A quick question about a CSS spec long in draft status ...
>
> In our continuing W3C spec reviews, PF discussion raised the question about whether a particular CSS feature was being implementedin browsers.
>
> The draft specification is Device Adaptation:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-device-adapt/
>
> The feature we're curious about is called "fixed zoom."
>
> Our telecon discussion about this is minuted at:
> http://www.w3.org/2014/08/20-pf-public-minutes.html#item09
>
> Again, we're interested whether or not "fixed zoom" is actually being
> implemented in shipping products.
>
> Any info you can provide would be very helpful.
>
> TIA
>
> Janina
>
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
> sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
> Email: janina@rednote.net
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
> Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
>
--
Indifference towards people and
the reality in which they live
is actually the one and only
cardinal sin in design.
— Dieter Rams
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 19:28:43 UTC