Re: Moving Name Computation to a separate specification document

I don't think the general concept of Name Computation is specifically tied to ARIA, so I wouldn't name the document "ARIA Names"… The fact that it references ARIA attributes like aria-label and aria-labelledby should be sufficient to make it obvious that it's within the PF's charter. 

If it hasn't been suggested already, what about "Accessible Name Computation"?



> On Sep 2, 2014, at 8:51 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> 
> How about calling an  Name Computation  document :  "ARIA names"
> 
> All the best
> 
> Lisa Seeman
> 
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects  <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/default.shtml>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:19:14 +0300 Michael Cooper<cooper@w3.org> wrote ---- 
> 
> We are expected to be chartered to do "WAI-ARIA...1.1" and "WAI-ARIA...1.1 Implementation Guides". If we split a document out of that, I think it's pretty clear it still falls under those deliverables. So we should be good. We might need to be careful about how we title the document so it's clear it's part of the ARIA suite.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> On 02/09/2014 4:22 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> 20140902202210.GC4350@concerto.rednote.net" type="cite">
> Hi, Rich: Responding to your question as per the Subject above ... I am confident we are well within our authority to break name computation, or any particular aspect of the ARIA suite as circumstances require. Michael can elaborate or correct, if needed. Also, it's arguably not too late even to add such a document to our list of deliverables inasmuch as our recharter is not yet approved, though I don't know where that is exactly, in the authorization process. At the moment we're still operating under an extension of our 3-year old plus charter. hth Janina 
> 
>