- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:38:57 -0800
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Chris Fleizach <cfleizach@apple.com>
- Message-id: <ABAA6C1F-5FF3-43FC-9E2B-40AABF29FC54@apple.com>
Element.role will be the reflected string value: for <h1 role="fake"> el.role -> read/write string "fake" el.computedRole -> readonly string "heading" > On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd say this is a11y use case since it's all about making the app accessible, in other words if we had no ARIA then CSS role selector would be rather useless. I think I like CSS role since it's nice for code unification, also imo that serves as rationale to have JS method for the role, but I still don't get why computedRole has to be on Element and why it prefixed by 'computed', having simple 'role' should work fine. > >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:17 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: >> Depends on what you call an an a11y-only use case. >> >> For example, a script to focus the first button (ARIA button or native) in a dialog? >> >> document.getElementBySelector(":role(dialog)")[0].getElementsBySelector(":role(button)")[0].focus(); >> >> Or by using one selector to style all the headings: >> >> *:role(heading) >> /* Mostly equivalent to "h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, [role=heading]" */ >> /* but the :role() selector catch some additional headings, like <div role="foo heading"> */ >> /* and the expanded selector would mismatch some others, like <h1 role="none"> */ >> >>> On Nov 11, 2014, at 10:32 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> a11y stuff in CSS is interesting idea but that shouldn't require Element interface extension. Do I understand right that there are non a11y use cases for a11y properties? Is it restricted to a11y role property only? >>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Are there any summary of pros and cons from the discussion? I still not sure that DOM Element is a right place to host accessibility methods. >>>> >>>> The primary argument was that role is useful outside the context of accessibility. The new CSS :role() selector is one example of that. >
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 22:39:27 UTC