- From: Birkir Gunnarsson <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:37:03 -0500
- To: "'Gunderson, Jon R'" <jongund@illinois.edu>, "'Steve Faulkner'" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Joanmarie Diggs'" <jdiggs@igalia.com>, "'Bryan Garaventa'" <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>, 'Léonie Watson' <LWatson@paciellogroup.com>, "'W3C WAI Protocols & Formats'" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <042501cffdbc$f6f31b00$e4d95100$@deque.com>
What would happen to an atomic aria-live region if the aria-current property on that element were updated? If updating the aria-current attribute fired an alert, aria-live could be used to announce the update to screen reader users as they are traversing the page. Screen readers )or other assistive technologies= could handle this update on their end by announcing content of updated container with the words “is now current” or similar. In other wordds: <li aria-live=”polite” aria-atomic=”true” aria-current=”false”>Step 2 – Billing Information</li> If updating aria-current from false to true caused an accessibility event to fire, assistive technologies could communicate this info along the lines of “Step 2 – Billing Information is nowcurrent element on this page” This way content authors could make this a function if desired and appropriate for the user. From: Gunderson, Jon R [mailto:jongund@illinois.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:26 AM To: Steve Faulkner; Birkir Gunnarsson Cc: Joanmarie Diggs; Bryan Garaventa; Léonie Watson; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats Subject: RE: Should user agents be expected to expose the presence of an aria-current descendant? I think the major benefit is when aria-current is on a link, users will know it is a link to the current page they are on. I don’t this we should be thinking of aria-current as some type of alternative to providing good page titling, useful headings (H1-H6) and landmark labeling to help users orient to the page they are on or the step in a sequence of pages. Jon From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 6:17 AM To: Birkir Gunnarsson Cc: Joanmarie Diggs; Bryan Garaventa; Léonie Watson; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats Subject: Re: Should user agents be expected to expose the presence of an aria-current descendant? On 11 November 2014 03:26, Birkir Gunnarsson <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com> wrote: Aria-current is an accessible alternative to what is frequently presented through CSS styling alone, in a way that is entirely inaccessible to assistive technologies. I don't think it needs to perform magic (although nobody would object to it). I think if we attached too much functionality and capacity to what started out as a simple attribute, we might start getting muddled in the implementation details. I think being able to use this attribute to indicate currently active element in a set of elements, and leave the implementation and features of that up to assistive technologies, that should be sufficient. After all, in most cases moving to the next steps in a user flow usually requires loading a new page, in which case an accessible page title will back up the change in the aria-current attribute. ++1 -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:37:32 UTC