They are valid XHTML roles, but the HTML validator may flag them as errors. On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > You know how sometimes as soon as you press send you realize the question asked was idiotic? Of course the values in section 3.1 are legitimate roles. Ignore me. > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > I was looking at the vocab document today [1] and noticed that the list of roles is divided into a short list that came from the original XHTML work (section 3.1) and a list that came from the ARIA work (section 3.2). I guess my question is "are the roles in section 3.1 recognized by ATs?" I imagine they are not. And if not, we should probably say so in the vocab document. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab >Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 19:37:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC