- From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:36:33 -0400
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+epNsfXCd4LGt+fnEK-3xrBy6PYsTwfXirYOKZc8DQmYvs5_g@mail.gmail.com>
I do have few concerns 1) A concern may be unrelated but aria-checked doesn't look clear [1], 'undefined' value is not defined or not linked, if it's supposed to define 'default value'/'missed value' then it's not in sync with implicit value for "checkbox" role [2] 2) aria-describedat says the browser should implement "a device-independent mechanism to allow a user to navigate the user agent to content" which is not clear whether the attribute should be mapped to accessibility API or the browser have to have some UI for that [3]. It'd be good to make it clear because if UI is an option here there then I would say "aria-describedat" should be rather part of HTML than ARIA. 3) Just curious what is a reason of aria-orientation change? Thanks. Alexander. [1] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/spec/aria.html#aria-checked [2] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/spec/aria.html#checkbox [3] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/spec/aria.html#aria-describedat On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:24 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > Thought I already sent this, but not seeing it in my outbox. > > I put in a placeholder for the "none" role (plus some editorial notes) for > Rich. The rest of the changes were various errata. See the #changelog at > the bottom. Note that the ReSpec transforms take about 5 or 10 seconds on > this spec so wait a few seconds for the redraw after loading. > > http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/spec/aria.html > > >
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 20:37:01 UTC