- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:44:31 -0500
- To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52D4886F.3010601@w3.org>
I've added ARIA markup to the ARIA and UAIG specs, and would like
review. This can be seen in the editors' drafts:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/
Overview of landmark roles I added:
* The W3C masthead at the top got role "contentinfo". That didn't seem
exactly right but I didn't find a better role. Because it's info
about that publication, not links to related docs, "contentinfo"
seemed more appropriate than "banner".
* The Abstract and Status got "complementary".
* The Table of Contents got "navigation".
* Everything after the TOC is wrapped in a big section with role "main".
* Notes got "note".
* On the page-per-chapter versions of the ARIA spec:
o The W3C banner at the top got "banner".
o The next / previous links got "navigation" - these links are
repeated at the top and bottom, I only put the role on the first
instance.
o The footer got "contentinfo".
o The content in between the header and footer got "main".
Let me know if these assignments make sense, work as expected, and if
you see other spots I could have added landmark roles.
Michael
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 00:44:33 UTC