- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:44:31 -0500
- To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52D4886F.3010601@w3.org>
I've added ARIA markup to the ARIA and UAIG specs, and would like review. This can be seen in the editors' drafts: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/ Overview of landmark roles I added: * The W3C masthead at the top got role "contentinfo". That didn't seem exactly right but I didn't find a better role. Because it's info about that publication, not links to related docs, "contentinfo" seemed more appropriate than "banner". * The Abstract and Status got "complementary". * The Table of Contents got "navigation". * Everything after the TOC is wrapped in a big section with role "main". * Notes got "note". * On the page-per-chapter versions of the ARIA spec: o The W3C banner at the top got "banner". o The next / previous links got "navigation" - these links are repeated at the top and bottom, I only put the role on the first instance. o The footer got "contentinfo". o The content in between the header and footer got "main". Let me know if these assignments make sense, work as expected, and if you see other spots I could have added landmark roles. Michael
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 00:44:33 UTC