- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:53:10 -0400
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-pfwg-comments@w3.org" <public-pfwg-comments@w3.org>
Thanks, Nigel. For the record, I'm OK with Nigel's wording below. I think we should move forward with it in the MAUR. Janina Nigel Megitt writes: > Dear Janina and PFWG, > > Thank you for these dispositions, which I've reviewed. I have one minor > tweak and one request for a further amendment: > > 1. Minor tweak > > The Comment item for Comment 16 on CC-10 includes a proposal that contains > a typo - "present" should be "preset". This is correct in the MAUR > document, so no action needs to be taken. In case of future queries about > the discrepancy, it might be worth editing the comment to match. > > 2. Request for a further amendment > > We Comment 24 on VP-5 in a telephone conference: there was confusion due > to my use of the phrase "as far as possible" which we clarified. > Unfortunately the sense of the sentence as we agreed has not been captured > correctly in the MAUR document. The intended sense of the phrase "as far > as possible" was that implementations should try as hard as possible to > avoid overlapping editorially important content, without saying anything > about how far away the text should be from that content. The sense carried > through to the document is different, i.e. that implementations should try > to maximise the distance from editorially important content. > > I propose that you reword the note to change the text: > > "If there are several types of overlapping overlays, they should be > positioned as far as possible from editorially important content." > > to: > > "If there are several types of overlapping overlays including captions and > subtitles, implementations should attempt to ensure that none of them > overlaps with editorially important content." > > The reason this is important is that in some cases it is desirable to > position captions and subtitles close to the mouths of the speakers who > are uttering the words being shown; in any case it is desirable for > authors to have the freedom to position them without implementations being > encouraged to move them. > > > I'm happy with the dispositions on all my other comments. Thank you! > > Kind regards, > > Nigel > > > > On 01/10/2015 03:20, "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > > >Dear Nigel: > > > >Thank you for your comments on the Media Accessibility User Requirements > >(MAUR): > > > >http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/media-accessibility-reqs/ > > > >The Protocols and Formats Working Group, together with the Media Subteam > >of > >the HTML-A11Y Task Force, has now reviewed all comments received on the > >draft. > >We would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly > >and > >whether you are satisfied with our resolutions. > > > >All comments received together with notes on our disposition of each > >comment > >are logged on the wiki at: > > > >https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/MAUR_Comment_Processing_2 > > > >Please review our resolutions for your comments at the above URI, and > >reply to > >us by Thursday 15 October to say whether you accept them or to discuss > >additional concerns you have with our response. If we do not hear from > >you by > >that date, we will mark your comment as "no response" and close it. If you > >need more time to consider your acknowledgement, please let us know. You > >can > >respond by email by replying to this message. Note that this list is > >publicly > >archived. > > > >Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an issue, > >you > >have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according to 3.3.2 of > >the W3C > >Process, at > >http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinority > >Views) > >Formal objections will be reviewed during the transition meeting with the > >W3C > >Director, unless we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in > >advance > >of the meeting. > > > >Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot > >always do exactly what each commenter requests, all comments are valuable > >to > >the development process. > > > >Regards, > > > >Janina Sajka, Chair > >Protocols and Formats WG > > > > > >-- > > > >Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > > Email: janina@rednote.net > > > >Linux Foundation Fellow > >Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > > >The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > >Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > > > -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 21:53:39 UTC