my vote is for (B) WAI-APT. I can live with WAI-ADAPT -becky > On Mar 28, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org> wrote: > > My vote is for (A) WAI-ADAPT > I could live with WAI-APT. > > Thanks > EOM > > Charles LaPierre > Principal, Accessibility Standards, and Technical Lead, Global Certified Accessible > Benetech > Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y > > > > >> On Mar 28, 2022, at 7:56 AM, Lionel Wolberger <lionel@userway.org <mailto:lionel@userway.org>> wrote: >> >> Dear Public Personalization Task Force member, >> >> This is a Call for Consensus regarding our Task Force's determination of the specification's name. Two names have made it to this final decision. Please find below each name, and how it will read as a prefix:module. >> >> Choice (A): WAI-ADAPT. >> Spelled out: >> WAI-ADAPT: Content Module, WAI-ADAPT: Help Module, WAI-ADAPT Tools Module >> >> Choice (B): WAI-APT. >> Spelled out: >> WAI-APT: Content Module, WAI-APT: Help Module, WAI-APT Tools Module >> >> Please note: (A) and (B) are not both abbreviations that need to be expanded. No expansion is necessary for ADAPT -- it is just "ADAPT". >> >> We propose a potential possible expansion for either of the above: "Adaptable Personalizeable Technologies". This expansion can be applied to "APT" or "ADAPT". >> >> Please reply to these two questions: >> 1. Which is your choice for the name of the standard, (A) WAI-ADAPT, (B) WAI-APT. >> 2. If your preference is not selected as the majority decision, can you live with the other option? Yes/No. If you answer "No" please explain. >> >> Thank you, >> >> - Lionel >> >> >> >> >> Lionel Wolberger >> COO, UserWay Inc. >> lionel@userway.org <mailto:lionel@userway.org> >> UserWay.org <http://userway.org/> <https://userway.org/> > Becky Gibson https://www.linkedin.com/in/beckygibsona11y/
Received on Monday, 28 March 2022 18:04:42 UTC