- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:28:49 -0400
- To: Roy Ran <ran@w3.org>
- Cc: public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Message-ID: <CAFmg2sVvODXhe0Ri-3UV=Lybjgj1EE1pifMNYapDqkWYYQ9-Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Roy, I've already noted that our 2 other modules are quite out of date: not only do they have that 'non-rec-track' comment, but the overall structure is different in the Help and Tools modules - different numbering than the Semantics module, so I suspect a major editorial overhaul is due. I've offered to do that if the TF agrees, and I've asked the chairs to add this topic to our next agenda. JF On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 7:40 AM Roy Ran <ran@w3.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > Our Explainer will be the W3C Note track document, it should have > included that sentence, and our 3 modules will be on Rec track. I noticed > our documents in TR space all are correct, but in GitHub, help and tool > module in editor’s draft need be fixed and I will fix them soon, thank you. > > Best, > > Roy > > On Jul 6, 2021, 2:44 AM +0800, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, wrote: > > Hi All, > > As part of my ACTION-88 > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/personalization/track/actions/88>, > I am in the process of doing a red-line review of the texts in our 4 draft > documents (Explainer, Semantics, Help, & Tools). > > With my "deep-dive-glasses" on today, I noted that *all* of our drafts > currently state (as part of the Abstract): > > "This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent > Policy <https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/>. *The group does > not expect this document to become a **W3C** Recommendation.*" > > Really? We don't expect this to become a Rec? > > For now, I will leave this as is, but with it an open question - is this > really correct, or is it a faux-pas that is now just surfacing as part of > the red-line review? (plausible - or perhaps there is some W3c policy at > play here that I am unaware of? Micahel/Roy?) > > I'm hoping we can resolve this on-list *before* next Monday's call, when > I *really* hope to have all of my editorial changes completed. > > Thanks in advance. > > JF > > > > -- > *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility > > "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - > Pascal "links go places, buttons do things" > > -- *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2021 12:29:22 UTC