Re: Time-Sensitive: Seeking Clarification

Hi John,

Our Explainer will be the W3C Note track document, it should have included that sentence, and our 3 modules will be on Rec track. I noticed our documents in TR space all are correct, but in GitHub, help and tool module in editor’s draft need be fixed and I will fix them soon, thank you.

Best,

Roy

On Jul 6, 2021, 2:44 AM +0800, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, wrote:
 Hi All,

As part of my ACTION-88, I am in the process of doing a red-line review of the texts in our 4 draft documents (Explainer, Semantics, Help, & Tools).

With my "deep-dive-glasses" on today, I noted that all of our drafts currently state (as part of the Abstract):

 "This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent Policy. The group does not expect this document to become a W3C Recommendation."

Really? We don't expect this to become a Rec?

For now, I will leave this as is, but with it an open question - is this really correct, or is it a faux-pas that is now just surfacing as part of the red-line review? (plausible - or perhaps there is some W3c policy at play here that I am unaware of? Micahel/Roy?)

I'm hoping we can resolve this on-list before next Monday's call, when I *really* hope to have all of my editorial changes completed.

Thanks in advance.

JF



--
John Foliot | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"