Re: Possible issue with the GitHub pages build?

Hi Matthew,

W3C has been using Travis CI to preview all pages through gh-pages branch before, but W3C stopped using Travis tool not long ago and is preparing to migrate to Github Action tool, so issue 193 is an issue related to this migration. Before the completion of this migration process, I currently set the previews in github to be in the main branch.

So there are two way to preview this page now, one is to create a suitable path for your HTML page and put them in main branch, or use the raw.githack.com tool to preview, and the link should be: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/gh-pages/review-of-approaches-for-action-destination-purpose.html.

Sorry for making you confused.

Best,

Roy
在 2021年8月26日 +0800 PM7:07，Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>，写道：
> Hi all,
>
> Roy: I wonder if you might be able to advise on this?
>
> I made a stand-alone HTML page as part of the "review of approaches" work. It lives in the gh-pages branch of the repo [1], so should be automagically hosted by GitHub along with the latest Explainer Editor's Draft and other content in there. The Explainer [0] is working, but the GitHub pages URL for the stand-alone HTML page for the review of approaches [2] isn't (it 404s). I think it did work when I added a link to it from the wiki, but it definitely isn't working now.
>
> I can't find anything obvious as to why the review of approaches HTML page isn't being hosted via the gh-pages branch, especially given that the other stuff is. I'm just wondering if any configuration has changed (or needs to be changed), to make it work?
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Matthew
>
> [0] Explainer Editor's Draft: https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/
> [1] gh-pages branch: https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/tree/gh-pages
> [2] Review of approaches: https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/review-of-approaches-for-action-destination-purpose.html
>
> P.S. JF showed me a neat trick to get HTML hosted from any branch in a repo, via GitHack, and it does work (thanks again), but it shouldn't be necessary in this case—the review of approaches HTML is in the gh-pages branch, so it should be getting served directly from GitHub. Odd!
> --
> Matthew Tylee Atkinson
> --
> Senior Accessibility Engineer
> TPG Interactive
> https://www.tpgi.com
> A Vispero Company
> https://www.vispero.com
> --
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately.
> Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>