Re: draft issue for TAG

I am wondering if we should also include the link to our
Requirements document
https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/WD-personalization-semantics-requirements-1.0-20200130/

Also I am wondering about including our wiki document on
Comparison of ways to use vocabulary in content
https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Comparison-of-ways-to-use-vocabulary-in-content

Thoughts?

Thanks
EOM
Charles LaPierre
Technical Lead, DIAGRAM and Born Accessible
Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
Skype: charles_lapierre


On Feb 11, 2020, at 12:06 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote:


Hello TAG!

We are requesting a TAG review of Personalization Semantics Explainer<https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-1.0/> and  Module 1 Adaptable Content<https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/>. It contains supporting syntax that provides the extra information, help, and context. We aim to make web content adaptable for users who function more effectively when content is presented to them in alternative modalities - including people with cognitive & learning disabilities.

  *   Explainer: https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-1.0/ and Module 1 : https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/
  *   Our wiki<https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki> and Getting-started<https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Getting-started-with-personalization-semantics>
  *   Security and Privacy self-review:  https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/131
  *   GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-dscp-exp/> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues
  *
Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
     *   Charles LaPierre charlesl@benetech.org<mailto:charlesl@benetech.org>
     *   Lisa Seeman lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
  *   Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: The Personalization Task Force of  APA WG
  *   Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: WG discussions
  *   External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): Beyond the discussion in the wiki on Implementations-of-Semantics<https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Implementations-of-Semantics>  there is also Easyreading<https://www.easyreading.eu/> and  Firefox https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/128 from our Demo at TPAC 2019 in Japan.
  *   Special considerations: We would like advice on porting from the "data-" prefix to a more permanent syntax in CR. Should we suggest a prefix or just plain attributes? Note as more modules are produced we could have a sizable number of attributes.



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>