W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-personalization-tf@w3.org > February 2020

draft issue for TAG

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:06:44 +0200
To: "Charles LaPierre" <charlesl@benetech.org>, "public-personalization-tf" <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>, "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net>
Message-Id: <17033476cd8.d6f37630138467.4879771919575333397@zoho.com>
Hello TAG!

We are requesting a TAG review of Personalization Semantics https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-1.0/ and  Modulehttps://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/. It contains supporting syntax that provides the extra information, help, and context. We aim to make web content adaptable for users who function more effectively when content is presented to them in alternative modalities - including people with cognitive & learning disabilities. 

Explainer: https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-1.0/ and Module 1 : https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/
https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki and https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Getting-started-with-personalization-semantics

Security and Privacy self-review:  https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/131

GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-dscp-exp/https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues

Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):

Charles LaPierre mailto:charlesl@benetech.org

Lisa Seeman lisa.seeman@zoho.com

Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: The Personalization Task Force of  APA WG 

Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: WG discussions

External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): Beyond the discussion in the wiki on https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Implementations-of-Semantics  there is also Ehttps://www.easyreading.eu/ and  Firefox https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/128 from our Demo at TPAC 2019 in Japan.

Special considerations: We would like advice on porting from the "data-" prefix to a more permanent syntax in CR. Should we suggest a prefix or just plain attributes? Note as more modules are produced we could have a sizable number of attributes.

All the best

Lisa Seeman

http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/, https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 08:07:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 11 February 2020 08:07:33 UTC