- From: Russell <russell@blissymbolics.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:41:01 -0400
- To: lisa.seeman@zoho.com
- Cc: Mats L <m.lundalv@gmail.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <fd6be145-eb6a-7e06-bec7-0054c15f0768@blissymbolics.org>
Hi Lisa, Yes, we agree that the reference numbers can be used in keeping with the w3c patent policy. If attribution can be made in the document, that would be great, otherwise I guess we can include it at the license url. For a stable url, would something like http://blissymbolics.org/w3c-license <http://blissymbolics.org/index.php/licensing> work? Have I understood you correctly? Thanks, Russell On 2019-08-22 11:18 a.m., lisa.seeman wrote: > Hi Russell > What time frame do you think it will take to get a decisions if we can > use the BCI *numbers* in the specification in keeping with the w3c > patent policy at https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy > > We would need the licence to be in a stable url to be able to use it > in our specification. > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > ---- On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:19:32 +0300 *Russell > <russell@blissymbolics.org <mailto:russell@blissymbolics.org>>* wrote ---- > > Hi Lisa, > > Well, that is a question that has never been asked before! My > initial reaction would be "no" but let me run it by the board just > in case. > > Russell > > On 2019-08-20 7:03 a.m., lisa.seeman wrote: > > > Hi Russell > > Thanks for getting back to us so quickly. > > We are just talking about using the BCI reference number. Not > the actual symbols. > We need people to be able to use the specification for profit > applications without paying royalties. > > Are the BCI numbers subject to copywrite and if so can people > make a "for profit" product that uses them (such as a web > page) royalty free? > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > ---- On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:42:27 +0300 *Russell > <russell@blissymbolics.org> > <mailto:russell@blissymbolics.org>* wrote ---- > > Hi Lisa, > > The licensing information can be found at: > > http://blissymbolics.org/index.php/licensing > > If you have any further questions about it, I am currently > the person to talk to. Attribution would be the only > requirement, I think. > > For ISO codes, there is an older ISO 8859 encoding but it > is no longer used or kept up to date. A proposal for a > Unicode encoding is in a very advanced stage and hopefully > that will become formalized very soon. There are some > technical issues with how indicators are overlaid on > symbols that is holding things up a bit but I am > optimistic that this obstacle will be overcome very soon. > However, the new Unicode encoding will consist of > Bliss-characters - ie the building blocks of the language > - and thus not contain every Bliss-word but only those > words that are also Bliss-characters. So for a numbering > system that refers to all Bliss-words, the BCI-AV numbers > are the ones to use. It is by far the most widely used > indexing. As far as other possible ISO standards such as > 7001 or 7010 but for complete pictographic/ideographic > languages, I'm not even aware of a standard let alone > Bliss being part of it. > > Russell > > > On 2019-08-19 11:06 a.m., lisa.seeman wrote: > > > Hi Russell! > > We are currently hoping to use BCI numbers as > references options in our specification. See > #symbol-explanation > <https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/content/#symbol-explanation> > Is there any copy-write involved? What licence would > that be under and is there a web link to it? > > Also do you know if any symbol sets have ISO codes? > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, > Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 13:36:46 UTC