Re: What issues are part of Mondays discussion

Greetings,

Please add my email address to the mailing list when you have a chance.

followthebrush@gmail.com

Best
Thaddeus

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 8:37 AM lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Hi Sam (and everyone else)
> On Monday we are hoping to discuss how to put the vocabularies into the
> page. I was looking over the issues and want to check we are on the same
> page about what needs to be included (other then the options already at
> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Comparison-of-ways-to-use-vocabulary-in-content
> )
>
> please let me know if any are missing.
>
> #73 <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/73> this is
> about using a javascript / json library as a way to pull in the semantics.
> I would include this in  the discussion on Monday. Do you agree?
>
>
> --items that are very important but not directly  part of Mondays
> discussion (I think)
>
> #72 - this is a call for better background (I added some more background
> there). I Assume you do not think this is part of the discussion on Monday
> - Is that correct? (it is still really important that we fully address )
>
> #76 <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/76> - this
> is about different layering and architectures.  some of the suggestions is
> exactly what the implemetions so far have done. some of your examples are
> exactly what the user implementations are doing   such as using  css at
> https://a11y-resources.com/developer/adaptable-ui-personalisation or an
> json triggered extension at
> http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/personlization.shtml
> Relevant wiki pages are
> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Implementations-of-Semantics
>  and
> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Architectural-issues (we
> should populate it)
> I also added a comment about why it needs to be declaried by the author
> and what needs to be done by the user agent.
> I assume you do not think this is part of the discussion on Monday - Is
> that correct?
>
> #74 <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/74> taxonomy
> alternatives - this is really important to look at when discussion what we
> need to define in the vocabulary.  But I assume you do not think this is
> part of the discussion on Monday - Is that correct?
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>