What issues are part of Mondays discussion

Hi Sam (and everyone else) On Monday we are hoping to discuss how to put the vocabularies into the page. I was looking over the issues and want to check we are on the same page about what needs to be included (other then the options already at  https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Comparison-of-ways-to-use-vocabulary-in-content) please let me know if any are missing. #73 this is about using a javascript / json library as a way to pull in the semantics. I would include this in  the discussion on Monday. Do you agree? --items that are very important but not directly  part of Mondays discussion (I think) #72 - this is a call for better background (I added some more background there). I Assume you do not think this is part of the discussion on Monday - Is that correct? (it is still really important that we fully address ) #76 - this is about different layering and architectures.  some of the suggestions is exactly what the implemetions so far have done. some of your examples are exactly what the user implementations are doing   such as using  css at  https://a11y-resources.com/developer/adaptable-ui-personalisation or an json triggered extension at http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/personlization.shtml Relevant wiki pages are https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Implementations-of-Semantics and https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Architectural-issues (we should populate it) I also added a comment about why it needs to be declaried by the author and what needs to be done by the user agent. I assume you do not think this is part of the discussion on Monday - Is that correct?  #74 taxonomy alternatives - this is really important to look at when discussion what we need to define in the vocabulary.  But I assume you do not think this is part of the discussion on Monday - Is that correct?  All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter