sounds like a good plan. we have found that this works some times — and for others we will have to have many rounds or never succeed. These both have to be recognized as outcomes as well. Another thing we found effective that you might want to add. Since all comments are open to the team, invite any team member who thinks they can address another team members issue, to post suggested edits or rewordings — to make your/charles’ work easier. > On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:52 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > To try and move forward with the specification at a reasonable speed we would like to suggest the following two week cycle: > > Prior to the first week Lisa/ Charles edit the the specification to remove glaring issues as much as possible (at least to stay ahead of the cycle bellow) > For the first week, participants review the next two or three items in the specification and add todo items that they feel need to be addressed for the next version. Suggestions are clarified on the weekly call > Lisa/ Charles edit the specification based on these suggestions which are reviewed and (hopefully) approved on the next weeks call (surveys will be used) > > > All the best > > Lisa and Charles > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > >
Received on Monday, 23 October 2017 12:46:21 UTC