- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:53:51 -0600
- To: Pemanent Identifier CG <public-perma-id@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reFzeFArQt3SFDH6771TB8nNMKJ2TAHgJbVmVcB_AM7jUg@mail.gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> Date: Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:53 PM Subject: Re: Problems and Opportunities at purl.org To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au I am confused - what about this isn't public? Also, I am not super enamored of trying to support multiple management formats. .htaccess is authoritative but complex. I don't mind one alternative for people who don't want to mess with the .htaccess complexities. CSV has the advantage of being a W3C Recommendation. Is there a reason to support more than one? On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:44 PM, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: > Can we do this publicly. > Other implementations are possible (e.g. the CSIRO PIDsvc > https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/wiki/Siss/PIDServiceUserGuide), so a neutral > format for redirection rules would be good (i.e not just .htaccess or purl > format) . > > Simon > > -----Original Message----- > From: stian@mygrid.org.uk [mailto:stian@mygrid.org.uk] On Behalf Of Stian > Soiland-Reyes > Sent: Monday, 29 February 2016 9:29 PM > To: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> > Cc: Pemanent Identifier CG <public-perma-id@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Problems and Opportunities at purl.org > > Yeah, let's get this going. > > So looking at the purl database schema we don't really need the group and > user stuff to start with (although that could be added to the README). > > the purls table itself should be sufficient to start. We can find the > different "type" values in the purl.org source code I think? > > > > On 29 February 2016 at 11:58, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > Greetings, all. > > > > A little while ago (and this message is a reply to > > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-perma-id/2015Dec/0001.htm > > l>, to resuscitate the thread), there was some interest expressed in a > > purl.org successor. That thread ended on a positive note, with David > > Wood and some others having access to the schema, and OCLC apparently > > keen on passing forward the current repository. > > > > I was asked about purl.org by a colleague today, and this reminded me > > about last November/December's thread: is there any news about > > purl.org or the broader preservation plan, that can be passed on? Or > > is there any way that I or others could help with this? > > > > > > All the best, > > > > Norman > > > > > > -- > > Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk > > SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK > > > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2016 01:54:23 UTC