- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:26:25 -0500
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: public-perma-id@w3.org, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2015 21:30:31 UTC
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:16 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > OCLC has been having significant trouble maintaining purl.org, which has > led to both a lot of discussions on the PURLz software community list, but > reductions in service. > > Logins at purl.org are currently disallowed, so PURLs are not > maintainable. Searching is also disabled. Libraries and researchers are > suffering from the loss. > > The PURLz discussions are being held here (subscription required): > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/persistenturls > > Monica Omodei of the Australian National Data Service proposed that this > group and/or the operators of the w3id.org service, simply take over > purl.org. Jeff Young at OCLC, the current part-time maintainer of purl.org, > thinks it is a good idea. > > The question is, do we wish to take over purl.org? Could we? I am (very) > willing to put time and effort into this, but note that the challenges > include providing a user-friendly user interface over the current w3id.org > system. > Sounds like a good idea. Not being a user of purl.org and not being familiar with its interface, what is missing in our current Github-based workflow? Steph.
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2015 21:30:31 UTC