- From: Nick Telford-Reed (w3c) <w3@stormglass.consulting>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:07:57 +0100
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABcn+k6xaA2MFvbkxuCXFEKK6mjWRM8+sxeki=jmxgq-sdFWfg@mail.gmail.com>
A gentle reminder that this call for consensus to publish a first public working draft of payment request v.1.1 closes today. Please indicate support or otherwise. Thank you Nick On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 14:46, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants, > > This is a Call for Consensus to publish the following specification as a > First Public Working Draft: > > Payment Request API > https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/ > (8 July 2022 draft plus any non-substantive edits). > Expected Title: Payment Request API 1.1 > Expected short name: payment-request-1.1 > > Publication as a First Public Working Draft does NOT indicate that the > document is complete or represents Working Group consensus. > > PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 18 July 2022 (14h00 UTC). > > For example, if you support the proposal, respond to this list with "1. > Support the proposal." > > We thank the editors for preparing this document. > > For the co-Chairs, > Ian Jacobs > > ---------- > BACKGROUND > > W3C published [1] Payment Request API 1.0 as a Proposed Recommendation > in September 2021. Since then, W3C has been working to resolve two > Formal Objections from W3C Members; see the Team Report [2] for > details. At this time, a Council is evaluating the Formal Objections > to determine whether Payment Request API 1.0 should advance to > Recommendation or be returned to the Working Group for changes. > > In the meantime, the Editors have continued to update the Editor's > Draft [3]. See below for information about changes since September > 2021. > > Developers and implementers are taking interest in the new features > defined in the Editor's draft. To provide them with more confidence > about these features, the Chairs would like to formally publish the > Editor's Draft as a new W3C Working Draft. This will also provide the > group with a foundation for potential discussion at TPAC about the > future of Payment Request. > > It is not uncommon for a Working Group to work on different revisions > of a specification simultaneously (e.g., see the CSS WG). With that in > mind, and because our current charter [4] anticipates enhancements to > Payment Request 1.0, we seek to publish a first 1.1 draft. > > Note: If Payment Request API 1.0 advances to Recommendation, the > Editors will determine whether it would be preferable to fold these > changes into an evolving 1.0 Recommendation, or to continue to nurture > a 1.1 branch. At the current time, we do not need to make that > decision. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9269 > [2] https://www.w3.org/2022/03/prapi-fo-report.html > [3] https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/ > [4] https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201912.html > > -------- > PROPOSAL > > That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve > publication of Payment Request API 1.1 as a First Public Working Draft on > the Recommendation Track. > > Please indicate one of the following in your response: > > 1. Support the proposal. > > 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested > changes are not taken into account. > > 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the > changes are taken into account. > > 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale). > > 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group. > > 6. Abstain. > > ------------------------------------------------ > CHANGES SINCE PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION (PUBLISHED SEP 2021) > > See the diff: > https://www.w3.org/2022/07/prapi-diff-20220707.html > > Substantive changes (the primary reason to publish): > > * Two new definitions for both the IDL type that > PaymentMethodData/data should be converted into, and for the > validation steps that a payment method will perform on it. This > allows payment method specs to define these in a way that is > cross-linkable to the PaymentRequest specification. This is useful > for Secure Payment Confirmation. This change is mostly editorial, > except that it allows for arbitrary error types to be thrown during > validation (previously only TypeError would be thrown). > > * Passing data on complete(). This is an optional feature that allows > payment handler to provide some information about the nature of a > completed payment. > > * Validate .data on construction. This is an optional feature > supported in Webkit. > > Non-substantive changes: > > * Added internationalization support for human readable labels (#971) > > * Low-level changes related to imported concepts (e.g., whose names changed > and we needed to update our reference to them). > > * Editorial fixes (example, cross-reference fix) > > ----------------- > FORMAL OBJECTIONS > > * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the > Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" > in your response and be sure to include substantive arguments or > rationale. > > * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore > they typically require significant time and effort to > address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues > related to the scope of this document rather than technical > content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision. > > * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection. > > * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the > individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that > would address the concern and increase consensus to publish. > > For more information, see: > https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#Consensus > > ---------- > NEXT STEPS > > Transition Request Following a Working Group Decision to Publish > > * In the case where this Call for Consensus results in a decision to > publish, the Chairs plan to request approval from the W3C Director > to publish a First Public Working Draft (including review of any > Formal Objections). > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 917 450 8783 > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 18 July 2022 10:08:46 UTC