Re: Request to add paypak in card network identifiers

Not really the real custodian is ABA ( American banker assosiation ) the actual issue about country specific bins is that over generalization or wrong implentation on them could happen generally referring the available websites of internet.

The case in point here is that troy owns

22050000- 22052999  

Paypak owns

 22054300 to 22064299 

Implementer have generalized 2205XXXX to troy. If a payments network identification mapping is maintained in this document it assist implementers alot. 



Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 12:26:26 AM
To: Azeem <azeem.yaseen@paysyslabs.com>
Cc: public-payments-wg@w3.org <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Request to add paypak in card network identifiers
 
Hi Azeem,

Rather than W3C maintain this information, is there a publicly available resource maintained within the card network world that we could reference?

Ian

> On Feb 4, 2021, at 1:21 PM, Azeem <azeem.yaseen@paysyslabs.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Ian ,
> 
> Thanks alot on having it added , Just a suggestion this document should also contain details on what bin ranges a card network owns , Right now on one browser bin owned by Paypak had been erroneously being tagged as troy i understand that it may be due to some  miscommunication but as a custodian of the card network identifier document a simple validation of card network ownership from ABA and then the bin range as an appendix of this  will help implementers alot. 
> 
> Best,  
> 
> Get Outlook for Android
> 
> From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021, 11:07 PM
> To: Azeem
> Cc: public-payments-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Request to add paypak in card network identifiers
> 
> Hello Azeem,
> 
> Thank you again for reaching out to us. Today the Working Group reached a decision [1] and we have added “paypak” 
> to the list of card network identifiers:
>   https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids <https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids>
> 
> Please note that this does not guarantee any particular implementation support, but of course we hope to see that.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ian
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2021/02/04-wpwg-minutes.html#t03 <https://www.w3.org/2021/02/04-wpwg-minutes.html#t03>
> 
> > On Jan 20, 2021, at 5:51 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Azeem,
> > 
> > I have added this to the Working Group’s agenda.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> > Ian
> > 
> >> On Jan 20, 2021, at 4:57 PM, Azeem <azeem.yaseen@paysyslabs.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> I am forwarding this request to add “Paypak” to the list of card network identifiers: https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids <https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids>
> >> Right now chrome is defaulting it to Troy which is a Turkish payments scheme.
> >> Paypak details below
> >> 
> >> https://1link.net.pk/pay-pak/ <https://1link.net.pk/pay-pak/>
> >> 
> > 
> > --
> > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ <https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/>
> > Tel: +1 718 260 9447
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ <https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/>
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ <https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/>
Tel: +1 718 260 9447