- From: Nick Telford-Reed <nick@stormglass.consulting>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 12:30:55 +0100
- To: "Chitalia, Jalpesh" <jchitali@visa.com>
- Cc: Matt Giuca <mgiuca@chromium.org>, Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "Liquan (Max) Gu" <maxlg@google.com>, Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@coil.com>
- Message-ID: <CABcn+k6P7ocF8MK3oe8RU4koM8wDO4w2YLWO83a_qnFQ1=W9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Doesn't removing amount as a mandatory field make doing the dynamic linking element of PSD2 SCA super hard? +Adrian@coil.com - how would your proposal work if the amount wasn't available from the requesting merchant? N On Wed, 6 May 2020, 6:10 am Chitalia, Jalpesh, <jchitali@visa.com> wrote: > That's a long time coming: making amount optional in a payment request is > essential, imho. While amount is necessary to provide better secure > experience / comprehension, there is also a point to be made for use cases > (like one mentioned below) where amount is not available prior to > requesting payment credentials and / or profile information (e.g. contact, > delivery address). And ideally, payment request should be flexible enough > to provide options for existing and future merchant checkout experiences. > > > > -jalpesh > > > > *From: *Matt Giuca <mgiuca@chromium.org> > *Date: *Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 9:22 PM > *To: *Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com> > *Cc: *Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "Liquan (Max) Gu" <maxlg@google.com>, Web > Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: FYI: Proposal for a "Web Payments Digital Product > Management API" > *Resent-From: *<public-payments-wg@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 9:21 PM > > > > Hi Web Payments folks, > > > > Thanks, as Ian said, feedback on the proposal is appreciated. (The latter > was proposed by Max, not me.) > > > > I am putting together a more concrete explainer on this proposal which > should hopefully be ready this week, but general thoughts on this direction > are appreciated any time. > > > > Matt > > > > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 05:22, Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com> > wrote: > > +Liquan (Max) Gu <maxlg@google.com> is also involved in this work and > would appreciate feedback. > > > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:20 PM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > Dear Web Payments Working Group, > > I came upon a somewhat recent proposal within the Web Incubator Community > Group for a "Web Payments Digital Product Management API” that would work > in conjunction with Payment Request. Here’s the proposal from Matt Giuca > (of the Chrome Team): > > https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-web-payments-digital-product-management-api/4350 > <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscourse.wicg.io%2Ft%2Fproposal-web-payments-digital-product-management-api%2F4350&data=02%7C01%7Cjchitali%40visa.com%7Cfb0f602f2c754489d60008d7f1751e15%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637243357657200037&sdata=5WpUJu%2FfYpuY6c92%2B8cXor7QS6Tzvvh%2Fubsa3XZG5Pk%3D&reserved=0> > > Problem statement: > > "The problem we are trying to solve is that Payment Request by itself > is inadequate for making in-app purchases in existing digital stores, > because that API simply asks the user to make a payment of a certain amount > (e.g., “Please authorize a transaction of US$3.00”), which is sufficient > for websites selling their own products, but established digital > distribution services require apps to make purchases by product IDs, not > monetary amounts (e.g., “Please authorize the purchase of SHINY_SWORD”); > the price being configured per-region on the backend.” > > Matt Giuca raised an issue on the Payment Request API that would make the > proposal easier to integrate: > > Make "total" and "details" optional > https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/912 > <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fpayment-request%2Fissues%2F912&data=02%7C01%7Cjchitali%40visa.com%7Cfb0f602f2c754489d60008d7f1751e15%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637243357657210031&sdata=rnt%2FAwY7i4Y0a1zu8Gjdu9OEXccT9visFKbghU7AFvY%3D&reserved=0> > > I’m sure Matt would appreciate feedback on either or both of the proposal > and the pull request. Thanks! > > Ian > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FPeople%2FJacobs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjchitali%40visa.com%7Cfb0f602f2c754489d60008d7f1751e15%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637243357657210031&sdata=H7jKJfcD0tCZEby5Lh4ZqVqp21vEhb7q78WzEnX12Fg%3D&reserved=0> > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 <(718)%20260-9447> > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 9 May 2020 12:48:42 UTC