Re: Call for Consensus to Request Formal Review of WPWG Charter - Review Requested by 8 November

Google supports option 3 and supports Marcos's proposal.

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 9:32 AM Luis Guzman <lguzman@nacha.org> wrote:

>
> Nacha supports the proposal (option 1)
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Luis Guzman
> Senior Director, Business & Product Development
> Nacha
> lguzman@nacha.org
> P 703-561-3962 <(703)%20561-3962>
> C 270-304-0917 <(270)%20304-0917>
>
> nacha.org
>
> The second Payments 2020 Call for Presentations is now open. Stand out as
> a thought leader in the payment industry. Register early for the conference
> and save. Learn more at https://payments.nacha.org.
>
> This message is intended for use by the addressee only and may contain
> privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended
> recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please delete all copies of the
> message and attachments and notify the sender immediately.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 11:50 AM
> To: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Call for Consensus to Request Formal Review of WPWG Charter -
> Review Requested by 8 November
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> ** This email has been received from outside the organization – Think
> before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. **
>
>
> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>
> The Web Payments Working Group's charter [1] expires 31 December 2019. We
> discussed rechartering during TPAC [2] and reviewed the draft charter at
> our 31 October teleconference [3].
>
> This is a Call for Consensus to request that the W3C Director submit the
> following charter for formal review by the W3C Membership:
> https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201910.html
>
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 8 November 2019 (10am ET).
>
> NOTES:
>
> * One goal of this review is for your organization to begin to look at the
> scope section of the charter. We would like to reduce the likelihood
> organizations raising scope-related concerns during the formal Advisory
> Committee review, expected to begin later in November.
>
> * If the Member review process has not been completed before the end of
> 2019, I expect W3C to extend the current Working Group charter through the
> review period.
>
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201803.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2019/09/15-wpwg-minutes.html#item14
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2019/10/31-wpwg-minutes.html
>
> =========
> PROPOSAL
>
> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director submit
> this revised Web Payments Working Group charter for formal review by the
> W3C Membership:
>  https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201910.html
>
> Here is a diff from the current charter:
>  https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201910-diff.html
>
> For more background on the (proposed) scheduling of the Payment Request
> 1.0 Proposed Recommendation, see:
>
> https://www.w3.org/blog/wpwg/2019/10/28/the-evolution-of-payment-request-api/
>
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>
> 1. Support the proposal.
>
> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even if suggested
> changes are not taken into account.
>
> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal unless the
> changes are taken into account.
>
> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>
> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>
> 6. Abstain.
>
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>
> If there is strong consensus by 8 November 2019 (10am ET) for the
> proposal, it will carry.
>
> ==========================
> Formal Objections
>
> * If you wish your LACK of support to publish to be conveyed to the
> Director and reviewed, please include the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" in your
> response and be sure to include substantive arguments or rationale. The W3C
> Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore they typically
> require significant time and effort to address.
>
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection.
>
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that would
> address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>
> For more information, see:
> https://www.w3.org/2019/Process-20190301/#Consensus
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 <(718)%20260-9447>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>