Re: Update on use of polyfill as implementation experience for exiting CR

+1

On 11 November 2017 at 12:57, <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Nov 11, 2017, at 7:48 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > What we are requesting is to be included in the implementation report to
> > demonstrate broader implementation than just the native browser
> > implementations. The logic being that implementation is a sort of wider
> > review of the technical nature of the specification and thus the more
> > diverse implementations that there are, the wider the review.
>
> I’m supportive of listing the polyfill. We can put it into its own section
> or whatever is appropriate. I can work with Manu to get the json file with
> the results to put into the report.
>
> However, in return, Manu, you need to let us know if we missed anything in
> the tests or if there is anything we should improve :)
>
> Deal?
>