W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > November 2017

Re: Update on use of polyfill as implementation experience for exiting CR

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:31:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_Je5YoqznuVUArf8hZJAus=ZshBvffHkS_NoXG6EikOWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
+1

On 11 November 2017 at 12:57, <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Nov 11, 2017, at 7:48 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > What we are requesting is to be included in the implementation report to
> > demonstrate broader implementation than just the native browser
> > implementations. The logic being that implementation is a sort of wider
> > review of the technical nature of the specification and thus the more
> > diverse implementations that there are, the wider the review.
>
> I’m supportive of listing the polyfill. We can put it into its own section
> or whatever is appropriate. I can work with Manu to get the json file with
> the results to put into the report.
>
> However, in return, Manu, you need to let us know if we missed anything in
> the tests or if there is anything we should improve :)
>
> Deal?
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:32:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:27 UTC