W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > May 2017

Re: Call for Consensus on Publishing Payment Handler API as a First Public Working Draft - RESPONSE REQUESTED by 11 May

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 23:10:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_JqE-s366YL_xmUmdRDyq4T6BhstpMYBC0JftAszvjytA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com>
Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
For Ripple:

1) Support the proposal

On 3 May 2017 at 20:17, Rouslan Solomakhin <rouslan@google.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>>
>> At the Chicago face-to-face meeting there was support [1] for issuing a
>> Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Payment Handler API as a First Public
>> Working Draft. Since the meeting the editors have worked to resolve several
>> issues and include issue markers in the text.
>>
>> This is a Call for Consensus to publish:
>>
>>  Payment Handler API
>>  https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-handler/tree/fpwd_20170502
>>
>>  Readable view:
>>  https://rawgit.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-handler/fpwd_
>> 20170502/index.html?specStatus=FPWD
>>
>> We would like to thank the editors for preparing this document.
>>
>> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 11 May 2017 (10am ET).
>>
>> For the co-Chairs,
>> Ian Jacobs
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/24-wpwg-minutes#item05
>>
>> =========
>> PROPOSAL
>>
>> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve
>> the
>> above specification as a First Public Working Draft on the Recommendation
>> Track.
>>
>> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>>
>>  1. Support the proposal.
>>
>>  2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>>      if suggested changes are not taken into account.
>>
>>  3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>>      unless the changes are taken into account.
>>
>>  4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>>
>>  5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>>
>>  6. Abstain.
>>
>> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>>
>> If there is strong consensus by 11 May 2017 (10am ET) for the proposal,
>> it will carry.
>>
>> ====================
>> REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS
>>
>> * Publication as a First Public Working Draft does NOT indicate that a
>> document
>>   is complete or represents Working Group consensus.
>>
>> * In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will request approval from
>> the W3C
>>   Director to publish a First Public Working Draft. In this case, if you
>> wish your LACK
>>   of support to publish to be conveyed to the Director and reviewed,
>> please include
>>   the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your response and be sure to
>> include
>>   substantive arguments or rationale.
>>
>> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].
>>
>> * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore
>>   they typically require significant time and effort to
>>   address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues
>>   related to the scope of these documents rather than technical
>>   content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision.
>>
>> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>>   individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that
>>   would address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>>
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 21:11:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:25 UTC