Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Two Candidate Recommendations - RESPONSE REQUESTED by 26 July 2017

CANTON support both proposals but would like to highlight that depriving
the payee (e.g. the merchant) of the ability to define a preference or to
steer payers to the use of the payment instrument the payee prefers, will
hinder the use of the APIs in the EU.

About PMI, we wish that, when it will be feasible, the conditions under
which PMI will be "validated, and when applicable, minted and formally
registred with the W3c" could be effectively clarified.

Jean-Yves

Jean-Yves ROSSI
+336  51 24 77 94
jean-yves.rossi@cantonconsulting.fr
[image: logo_CANTON-Consulting] CANTON <http://goog_1803985827/> -
Consulting <http://cantonconsulting.eu/>
*Découvrez NDP, le meilleur outil de veille
<http://cantonconsulting.eu/edition/abonnement/abonnement-decouverte-formule-d-essai-incluant-4-numeros>
sur
les ruptures du monde du paiement !*

2017-07-24 22:13 GMT+02:00 Theresa O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>:

> Hi Ian,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
> >
> > This is a Call for Consensus to publish the following specifications
> > as Candidate Recommendations:
> >
> > Payment Request API
> > https://rawgit.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/a7e1bdab27ec6ae78
> d56c32ec0d20ba3df03f387/index.html?specStatus=CR&crEnd=2017-
> 10-31&implementationReportURI=https://w3.org/tbc
> >
> > Payment Method Identifiers
> > https://rawgit.com/w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/cbaf86
> 4de1d46d93ce60e34b7b3cd643073243ae/index.html?specStatus=CR&
> crEnd=2017-10-31&implementationReportURI=https://w3.org/tbc
>
> We support this CfC.
>
>
> Tess
>
>