Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Two Candidate Recommendations - RESPONSE REQUESTED by 26 July 2017

> On Jul 20, 2017, at 8:07 AM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 16:30:31, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>> RESPONSE REQUESTED by 26 July 2017
>> 
>>>> How long is the CR period for each document expected to be?
>>> 
>>> Answering my own question, it looks like 30 Sep. for Payment Request,
>>> and 31 Oct. for Payment Method Identifiers.
>> 
>> I thought the the intent was 31 October for both (given the &crEnd date query
>> parameter in both URLs).
>> However, I see you are right that PR API says “30 September.”
>> 
>> Editors, is there a reason for a difference? If not, I suggest we align on 31
>> October.
>> 
>> Thanks for spotting this, Tess.
> 
> I hadn't realised there was text in the PR API document with a date so that
> document has both dates if you follow the CfC link. I think 3 months is a
> reasonable time but the minimum length of CR period should be a WG decision
> and I'd be equally happy saying 30 Sep.

I propose 31 October for both and will suggest that on today’s call.

Ian
--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 718 260 9447

Received on Thursday, 20 July 2017 13:09:58 UTC