- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:15:38 -0600
- To: Web Payments Working Group <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Minutes from today’s call: https://www.w3.org/2017/02/28-apps-minutes Next call: 7 February Ian > On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > Participants in the payments app task force, > > We meet 28 January at 10am ET. > > Previous meeting 21 February: > https://www.w3.org/2017/02/21-apps-minutes > > WebEx: > http://www.w3.org/2017/01/paymentapps-2017.ics > > Ian > > ======== > For reference > > Proposal (summary of where we are on key issues): > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/wiki/Proposal-20170130 > > I would like to review the updated summary since last week's call. > (I welcome people's review between now and the meeting. It's not very long.) > > Also, I'd like to discuss spec updates based on our increasing convergence. I would > like to have an updated spec in time for the FTF meeting. > > Issues list: > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues > > ---------------------------------------- > Issue 99: New request/response objects for payment apps > Issue 95: Replace setManifest()/getManifest() with set()/get()/keys()/has()/delete() > Issues 98, 90, 70, 69: Apps, wallets, and options > > We merged AdamR's proposal: > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/commit/4430d10f1b0957196576b8018a095a4b5a26eb81 > > AdamR, what are next steps for this proposal? > > ---------------------------------------- > Issue 91: Line items and privacy > > Reopened based on Marcos privacy question: > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/91#issuecomment-279904374 > > ---------------------------------------- > Issues 73, 97: Opening Windows > > Action: Marcos and Tommy to draft a proposal for openClientWindow. > > ---------------------------------------- > Issues 83, 96: Filters/capabilities > > At the 23 Feb WPWG call, we discussed Rouslan's proposal > https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/420 > https://www.w3.org/2017/02/23-wpwg-minutes#item02 > > Rouslan is planning to make some updates regarding (1) explicit > identification of filters with (2) limited backwards compatibility for > managing the way basic card has been implemented up to now. We also > want to check with MS on the proposal. > > ---------------------------------------- > Recommended payment apps (74, 79) > (Discussed 14 Feb but no resolution) > > ACTION: Task force to review Ian's proposal (to drop Recommended payment apps > from the payment app API but continue to investigate as a separate layer): > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/74#issuecomment-278340715 > > ACTION: Task force to review Tommy's approach to recommending apps when none available: > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/74#issuecomment-278941318 > > Some were discussed 31 Jan: https://www.w3.org/2017/01/31-apps-minutes#item01 > > > ======= > Next meeting > > * 5 March > > ======== > Other issues > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2017 16:15:45 UTC