W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2017

Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update to tokenized card spec to include more examples and additional… (#213)

From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:36:19 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/pull/213/c280451973@github.com>
Thanks, Kevin! I have a couple of minor suggestions:

* s/The intention is for this to extend from/This specification extends

* s/supports sending the/supports sending a/          (We've not introduced the notion of a "token/cryptogram combination" yet)

* I suggest we delete "There is often a higher cost associated with issuer tokens." People are going to decide which token type they want to use for a variety of reasons, and this feels to me both incomplete as far as "help in making a choice" and also unnecessary to understand the specification. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 20:37:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:24 UTC