- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:36:19 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 20:37:04 UTC
Thanks, Kevin! I have a couple of minor suggestions: * s/The intention is for this to extend from/This specification extends * s/supports sending the/supports sending a/ (We've not introduced the notion of a "token/cryptogram combination" yet) * I suggest we delete "There is often a higher cost associated with issuer tokens." People are going to decide which token type they want to use for a variety of reasons, and this feels to me both incomplete as far as "help in making a choice" and also unnecessary to understand the specification. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/pull/213#issuecomment-280451973
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 20:37:04 UTC