Re: Call for reviews of HTTP API and Core Messages proposals

Hi Katie,

Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, 2016-05-02 10:48 -0400:
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/52a801d1a481$a64ac730$f2e05590$@gmail.com>
> 
> Ian,
> 
> If a user is mobility impaired and needs their preferred voice-only UI
> wallet/agent/system (that uses this HTTP API) to complete a payment using
> our architecture, they can.
> 
> If a user is blind and uses a screen reader, and they need to use a
> specific UI wallet/agent/system (that uses this HTTP API) that they have
> chosen because it works best with their screen reader, to complete a
> payment using our architecture, they can.
> 
> If a user has cognitive limitations and need a simplified UI
> wallet/agent/system (that uses this HTTP API) that they have chosen
> because it works best for them, to complete a payment using our
> architecture, they can.
> 
> Does that help?

By “wallet/agent/system (that uses this HTTP API)”, you mean these are non-
browser applications such as native mobile apps, or non-browser desktop
apps—which do not themselves run on the Web, as Web applications, at URLs
on the Web, but off the Web somewhere else?

  —Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike

Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 15:04:52 UTC