Re: [webpayments] PROPOSAL: Adopt ISO20022 terminology for payer and payee and use synonyms as appropriate (#62)


Your proposal is unclear wrt. where the changes would be made. Here's what I suggest:

1. We do the WPWG Term/Common Terms/ISO20022 alignment in the WPIG Glossary.
2. The WPIG Glossary is automatically pulled into the specs (this already happens today).
3. We use the term "payee" and "payer", or whatever the W3C Web Payments Term is in the specs.

The flows can use the more specific terminology, if that's what that Task Force wants (and I can see a good reason to do that in the Flows, but not in the specs, which are supposed to be more generalized).

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:47:25 UTC