W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [webpayments] Should a payment request be just data, or a programmable object? (#36)

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:16:13 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/36/173481151@github.com>

Moved @msporny proposal to it's own issue so that the discussion may continue on this thread if the proposal is not accepted.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/36#issuecomment-173481151

Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 07:16:46 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adrian Hope-Bailie: "Re: [webpayments] PROPOSAL: Adopt ISO20022 terminology for payer and payee and use synonyms as appropriate (#62)"
Previous message: Adrian Hope-Bailie: "[webpayments] PROPOSAL: The PaymentRequest object will not have code attached to it. It will be a pure data object. (#64)"
Maybe in reply to: Manu Sporny: "Re: [webpayments] Should a payment request be just data, or a programmable object? (#36)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:13 UTC