- From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 20:24:41 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 04:25:11 UTC
-1 I think this is a really bad idea. The audience for the spec (Web Developers) don't know what a 'creditor agent' or even what a 'creditor' really means... appending it to "merchant (creditor)" is not good either because it puts aliases beside every term in the spec, making the spec that much harder to read. I suggest we instead do use ISO20022, but put the alias in the definition of what a "merchant" or a "payee" is. That way, you get to align w/ ISO20022, you use terminology that Web developers are somewhat familiar with, and you don't start putting term aliases in the spec text. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/59#issuecomment-173447773
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 04:25:11 UTC