W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [paymentrequest] Should well-known identifiers be used for ubiquitous payment methods (#35)

From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:06:47 -0800
To: WICG/paymentrequest <paymentrequest@noreply.github.com>
Cc: webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <WICG/paymentrequest/issues/35/169775916@github.com>
>> We should make the processing rules explicit,

> We would, via the specification of the API.

How would we do that (specifically)?

> Where versioning is needed, it should be done at the level of the whole API.

How is versioning at the API level done?

>  I don't think the messages themselves have meaning outside of SOME API (and we are likely to define more than one of them).

That we're likely to define more than one API is exactly why the messages have meaning outside of an API. Data has meaning outside of an API.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2016 19:07:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:13 UTC