W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [paymentrequest] "JSON object" is confusing; consider "JSON-serializable object" (#59)

From: Ade Bateman <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:36:01 -0800
To: WICG/paymentrequest <paymentrequest@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <WICG/paymentrequest/issues/59/187453812@github.com>

Fixed by #63.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/paymentrequest/issues/59#issuecomment-187453812

Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 00:36:38 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ade Bateman: "Re: [paymentrequest] Algorithm for complete(success) does not use its argument (#55)"
Previous message: Ade Bateman: "Re: [paymentrequest] Don't have a <dfn> for "user agent" (#60)"
In reply to: Domenic Denicola: "[paymentrequest] "JSON object" is confusing; consider "JSON-serializable object" (#59)"
Next in thread: Ade Bateman: "Re: [paymentrequest] "JSON object" is confusing; consider "JSON-serializable object" (#59)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC