W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [webpayments] What are the WPWG February 2016 face-to-face prioritized issues (#89)

From: mattsaxon <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 04:01:05 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/89/185171992@github.com>
I would like to add either to the agenda or as an issue the following;

Adoption/Transition of the API
        a. Finding the relevant payment application
        b. If merchant can prefer one payment app over another if there are multiple apps that can perform the same method
        b. Fall-back methods when no such app exists (or the shopper doesn't want to sign-up to the terms & conditions)
        c. What our expectation is for situations where the merchant wants to override the 1.0 implementations to better control the flow

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 12:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC