W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

[webpayments] Flow terminology (#92)

From: mattsaxon <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:11:13 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/92@github.com>

The flows as defined today do not have a consistent naming convention for actors/sequences/roles - those elements should be defined in a similar way throughout all flows.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/92

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 09:11:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: mattsaxon: "[webpayments] ISO20022 terminology adoption (#93)"
Previous message: Shane McCarron: "Re: Sanity check on API using flows from Flows Task Force"
Next in thread: mattsaxon: "Re: [webpayments] Flow terminology (#92)"
Reply: mattsaxon: "Re: [webpayments] Flow terminology (#92)"
Reply: mattsaxon: "Re: [webpayments] Flow terminology (#92)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC